Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care | Zendy

Saul N. Weingart | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care

Author(s) -

Saul N. Weingart

Publication year - 2001

Publication title -

international journal for quality in health care

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.769

H-Index - 94

eISSN - 1464-3677

pISSN - 1353-4505

DOI - 10.1093/intqhc/13.5.357

Subject(s) - documentation , quality (philosophy) , medicine , family medicine , chart , medline , medical record , quality management , acute care , sample (material) , health care , operations management , surgery , management system , philosophy , statistics , mathematics , chemistry , epistemology , chromatography , computer science , political science , law , economics , programming language , economic growth

Although Peer Review Organizations (PROs) and researchers rely on physicians to assess quality of care, little is known about what physicians think about when they judge quality. We sought to identify features of individual cases that are associated with physicians' judgments.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research