Open AccessHygrothermal Monitoring of Two Pilot Prefabricated Exterior Energy Retrofit Panel Designs
Author(s) -
Brock Conley,
Mark Carver,
Sébastien A. Brideau
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/2069/1/012028
Subject(s) - oriented strand board , moisture , relative humidity , constructability , cladding (metalworking) , expanded polystyrene , composite material , materials science , environmental science , structural engineering , engineering , physics , thermodynamics
NRCan undertook a proof-of-concept project to retrofit a small building with prefabricated wall panels in 2017 in Ottawa, Canada. The retrofit used two wall panel designs: nailbase and woodframe. The Nailbase panel consisted of fiberglass batt, an expanded polystyrene (EPS) core, oriented strand board (OSB) sheathing, a rainscreen, and cladding. The Woodframe panel also featured OSB sheathing and included a 90 mm stand-off gap filled with dense-packed, fibrous insulation. A side-by-side comparison of cost, constructability, and performance was performed. The wall assemblies were instrumented to monitor the temperature, relative humidity, and moisture content of sensitive layers. The data was used to evaluate the hygrothermal performance, moisture accumulation, and risk of associated problems such as mould growth. This paper presents the monitored hygrothermal data from 2017 to 2021, compares the two approaches and assesses their feasibility. During construction, some of the fibrous insulation may have been wetted by wind-driven snow before completion. The data showed that this moisture was able to dissipate without significant risk. The sheathing of the Woodframe panel experienced a higher peak moisture content during the dry-out period. Otherwise, both panel designs showed limited potential for mould growth on monitored surfaces over the monitored period.