z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Low‐altitude UAV air‐ground propagation channel measurement and analysis in a suburban environment at 3.9 GHz
Author(s) -
Cui Zhuangzhuang,
Briso César,
Guan Ke,
Matolak David W.,
CalvoRamírez César,
Ai Bo,
Zhong Zhangdui
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
iet microwaves, antennas and propagation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.555
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1751-8733
pISSN - 1751-8725
DOI - 10.1049/iet-map.2019.0067
Subject(s) - delay spread , path loss , multipath propagation , channel (broadcasting) , ray tracing (physics) , power delay profile , elevation (ballistics) , remote sensing , computer science , altitude (triangle) , root mean square , environmental science , propagation delay , acoustics , physics , telecommunications , engineering , electrical engineering , geology , optics , wireless , geometry , mathematics , computer network , astronomy
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been applied to various promising applications because of their features of high‐mobility, portability, rapid deployment, and modest power consumption. Small UAVs fly at low altitudes and typically short distances from the ground controller. It is of interest and value to model the propagation channel between low‐altitude UAVs and ground stations. This article presents results of channel measurements at 3.9 GHz carried out in a suburban environment with a small‐size UAV flying at low altitudes, up to 40 m. The authors also present comparative results from ray‐tracing simulations. Height‐dependent models for path loss, root mean square (RMS) delay spread, and the number of multipath components are provided. The results illustrate that although multipath effects exist at low altitudes in this environment, the two‐ray path loss model works reasonably well in describing the channel behaviour. Initial ray tracing simulations show reasonable agreement with measurements. In addition, RMS delay spread results indicate that distant scatterers have an appreciable effect on the UAV air‐ground (AG) propagation channels, which can be different from some terrestrial channels. Authors’ results should be of use in the modelling of low‐altitude AG propagation channels and in the performance analysis of UAV‐enabled AG communication systems.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom