Premium
Sensorless Flow and Head Estimation in the VentrAssist Rotary Blood Pump
Author(s) -
Ayre P.J.,
Vidakovic S.S.,
Tansley G.D.,
Watterson P.A.,
Lovell N.H.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
artificial organs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.684
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1525-1594
pISSN - 0160-564X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06586.x
Subject(s) - impeller , pressure head , head (geology) , centrifugal pump , volumetric flow rate , specific speed , viscosity , control theory (sociology) , biomedical engineering , flow (mathematics) , materials science , mechanics , computer science , engineering , mechanical engineering , physics , control (management) , geomorphology , artificial intelligence , composite material , geology
Abstract: Flow rate and pressure difference (or head) are key variables needed in the control of implantable rotary blood pumps. However, use of flow and/or pressure probes can decrease reliability and increase system power consumption and expense. For a given fluid viscosity, the flow state is determined by any 2 of the 4 pump variables: Flow, pressure difference, speed, and motor input power can be used. Thus, if viscosity is known or if its influence is sufficiently small, flow rate and pressure difference can be estimated from the motor speed and motor input power. For the VentrAssist centrifugal blood pump, which uses a hydrodynamic bearing, sensorless flow and pressure head estimation accuracy of 2 of our impeller designs were compared for a viscosity range of 1.2 to 4.5 mPas. This showed impeller design optimization can improve estimation accuracy. We also compared estimation accuracy using 2 blood analogues used in vitro, aqueous glycerol and red blood cells suspended in Haemaccel. The nature of the blood analogue and not only the viscosity of the fluid seems to influence estimation accuracy in our pump.