z-logo
Premium
The incidence of detrusor instability before and after colposuspension: a study using conventional and ambulatory urodynamic monitoring
Author(s) -
Brown,
Paul Hilton
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00390.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ambulatory , detrusor instability , incidence (geometry) , stress incontinence , surgery , urodynamic testing , cystometry , urge incontinence , urodynamic studies , urology , urinary incontinence , urinary bladder , optics , physics
Objective To determine the incidence of detrusor instability (DI) detected by conventional and ambulatory bladder pressure monitoring, any link between urodynamic findings before and after colposuspension, and between patients’ symptoms and the urodynamic findings. Patients and methods Sixty‐five patients, scheduled to undergo colposuspension on the basis of pure genuine stress incontinence on conventional cystometrography (CMG), also underwent ambulatory monitoring (AM) before surgery. All were requested to return 3 months afterward for repeat CMG and AM in random order. In all, 56 patients completed all assessments before and after surgery. In addition to the urodynamic assessment, the patients’ symptoms before and after surgery were compared using a detailed questionnaire. Results On AM before surgery, half the patients showed some DI; afterward, the incidence on AM was 70% and on CMG was 27%. However, on AM, 25% of patients who had DI before surgery showed no evidence of it afterward. Of the 19 women who complained of urgency preoperatively, 16 showed DI on preoperative AM. However, of the 37 women denying urgency preoperatively, 12 (32%) also showed evidence of DI on preoperative AM. Conclusions There is a significant incidence of DI detected by CMG after colposuspension in patients who are stable before surgery. The incidence of DI on AM was significantly higher than on CMG both before and after surgery. However, the preoperative urodynamic finding of increased DI on AM does not exclusively predict its presence postoperatively on AM or CMG. In addition, a patient history of urgency does not correlate well with the urodynamic findings before or after surgery. Therefore, from this study it appears that the postoperative symptomatic or urodynamic state cannot be predicted reliably from those before surgery.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom