Premium
Inpatient care and its outcome in a specialist psychiatric unit for people with intellectual disability: a prospective study
Author(s) -
Raitasuo S.,
Taiminen T.,
Salokangas R. K. R.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of intellectual disability research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.941
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1365-2788
pISSN - 0964-2633
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1999.00201.x
Subject(s) - brief psychiatric rating scale , psychiatry , medicine , inpatient care , intellectual disability , psychiatric assessment , unit (ring theory) , psychology , psychosis , health care , mathematics education , economics , economic growth
The outcome of treatment in care units has been thought to reflect the effectiveness of treatment. There have been only a few studies describing inpatient care and its outcome in patients with intellectual disability and psychiatric symptoms. The present study describes the psychiatric inpatient treatment in the specialist psychiatric unit of the Special Welfare District of South‐west Finland and the need for aftercare among people with intellectual disability and psychiatric disorders (n = 40). As an outcome measure of care, the level of psychiatric symptoms was evaluated either with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) or with the Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped (DASH) scale; self‐reports (visual analogue scale) were also used. Patients’ psychotic symptoms were reduced significantly on the BPRS during inpatient care and aftercare, but non‐psychotic symptoms were reduced significantly only during aftercare. For one patient, the psychiatric symptoms were reduced significantly during inpatient care on the DASH scale, while the psychiatric symptoms remained the same for three patients. Patients and their primary carers considered the patient’s psychiatric condition to have improved significantly during inpatient care, but not during aftercare. The specialist unit filled the gap in the care of people with intellectual disability and psychiatric problems in Southwest Finland. It is concluded that psychotic patients particularly benefit from the inpatient care in the specialist psychiatric unit. The care in the unit should include support for primary carers. All patients’ outpatient treatment should also be re‐evaluated. The present study poses two important questions. Firstly, could these treatment outcomes have been achieved with other interventions? Secondly, what are the necessary services for people with intellectual disability?