Premium
Mucosite périimplantaire expérimentale chez l’homme
Author(s) -
Zitzmann N. U.,
Berglundh T.,
Marinello C. P.,
Lindhe J.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of clinical periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.456
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1600-051X
pISSN - 0303-6979
DOI - 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028006517.x
Subject(s) - medicine , mucositis , soft tissue , peri , biopsy , implant , dentistry , lesion , pathology , surgery , radiation therapy
Abstract Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine reactions of gingiva and peri‐implant mucosa (PiM) to de novo plaque accumulation in humans. Material and Methods: Prior to the start of the study, which included 12 partially edentulous subjects, a 3‐week plaque control program was performed. Ethical approval was granted by the local ethics committee. On day 0, 2 soft tissue biopsies were harvested, 1 from a tooth and 1 from an implant site in every subject. After 3 weeks of undisturbed plaque accumulation (day 21), 2 additional biopsies were obtained from the gingiva and PiM in each subject. The tissue samples, each 4×4 mm in size, were snap frozen and prepared for immunohistochemical analysis. Results: The size of the infiltrate (ICT) in the day 0 biopsies, was about 0.03 mm 2 in both the gingiva and PiM. At the end of the plaque accumulation period, the size of the lesion had significantly increased in both groups and occupied an area of 0.26 mm 2 in the gingiva and 0.14 mm 2 in PiM. In the biopsies presenting day 0, the proportions of the various cell populations examined were similar in the gingiva and in PiM. The tissue fractions of almost all types of cells increased during the 3 weeks, but the mean change for each cell type was greater in the gingiva than in PiM. The CD3/CD19 ratio decreased in the gingiva between day 0 and 21, but increased in PiM. Conclusion: The results of the present study indicated that plaque accumulation induced an inflammatory response characterized by increased proportions of T‐ and B‐cells in the ICT of both the gingiva and the PiM. Although not statistically significant, the host response in the gingiva tended to be more pronounced than in the peri‐implant mucosa.