z-logo
Premium
The application of inverse theory to seamount magnetism
Author(s) -
Parker Robert L.,
Shure Loren,
Hildebrand John A.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
reviews of geophysics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 8.087
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1944-9208
pISSN - 8755-1209
DOI - 10.1029/rg025i001p00017
Subject(s) - seamount , magnetization , magnetic anomaly , inverse problem , surface (topology) , anomaly (physics) , inverse , mathematical analysis , mathematics , geophysics , physics , magnetic field , geology , geometry , quantum mechanics , oceanography
The traditional least squares method for modeling seamount magnetism is often unsatisfactory because the models fail to reproduce the observations accurately. We describe an alternative approach permitting a more complex internal structure, guaranteed to generate an external field in close agreement with the observed anomaly. Potential field inverse problems like this one are fundamentally incapable of a unique solution, and some criterion is mandatory for picking a plausible representative from the infinite‐dimensional space of models all satisfying the data. Most of the candidates are unacceptable geologically because they contain huge magnetic intensities or rapid variations of magnetization on fine scales. To avoid such undesirable attributes, we construct the simplest type of model: the one closest to a uniform solution as measured by the norm in a specially chosen Hilbert space of magnetization functions found by a procedure called seminorm minimization. Because our solution is the most nearly uniform one we can say with certainty that any other magnetization satisfying the data must be at least as complex as ours. The theory accounts for the complicated shape of seamounts, representing the body by a covering of triangular facets. We show that the special choice of Hilbert space allows the necessary volume integrals to be reduced to surface integrals over the seamount surface, and we present numerical techniques for their evaluation. Exact agreement with the magnetic data cannot be expected because of the error of approximating the shape and because the measured fields contain noise of crustal, ionospheric, and magnetospheric origin. We examine the potential size of the various error terms and find that those caused by approximation of the shape are generally much smaller than the rest. The mean magnetization is a vector that can in principle be discovered from exact knowledge of the external field of the seamount; this vector is of primary importance for paleomagnetic work. We study the question of how large the uncertainty in the mean vector may be, based on actual noise, as opposed to exact, data; the uncertainty can be limited only by further assumptions about the internal magnetization. We choose to bound the rms intensity. In an application to a young seamount in the Louisville Ridge chain we find that remarkably little nonuniformity is required to obtain excellent agreement with the observed anomaly while the uniform magnetization gives a poor fit. The paleopole position of ordinary least squares solution lies over 30° away from the geographic north, but the pole derived from our seminorm minimizing model is very near the north pole as it should be. A calculation of the sensitivity of the mean magnetization vector to the location of the magnetic observations shows that the data on the perimeter of the survey were given the greatest weight and suggests that enlargement of the survey area might further improve the reliability of the results.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here