Premium
Reply [to “Comment on ‘A new hydrous silicate, a water reservoir, in the upper part of the lower mantle’ by Eiji Ohtani, Hiroki Mizobata, Yasuhiro Kudoh, Toshiro Nagase, Haruo Arashi, Hisayoshi Yurimoto, and Isoji Miyagi”]
Author(s) -
Ohtani Eiji,
Mizobata Hiroki,
Kudoh Yasuhiro,
Nagase Toshiro,
Arashi Haruo,
Yurimoto Hisayoshi,
Miyagi Isoji
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/98gl00542
Subject(s) - silicate , phase (matter) , metastability , mineralogy , thermodynamics , geology , mantle (geology) , analytical chemistry (journal) , materials science , chemistry , geochemistry , physics , environmental chemistry , organic chemistry
Phase G reported by Ohtani et al. [1997] and Kudoh et al. [1997a] is identical with the new phase D reported by Kuroda and Irifune [1998] and Yang et al. [1997]. However, there is ambiguity on existence of phase D defined by Liu [1987]. There are following possibilities on existence of Liu's phase D; (1) the product was a mixture of phase G and the other contaminant phases, (2) it realy exists stably in different pressure and temperature conditions from those studied by our works, or (3) the phase is a metastable phase formed due to a short run duration and/or no sealing of water in the diamond anvil cell. Therefore, it is not appropriate to use the name phase D for the dense hydrous magnesium silicate phase G reported by us [ Ohtani et al., 1997].