Premium
Wintertime In Situ Cloud Microphysical Properties of Mixed‐Phase Clouds Over the Southern Ocean
Author(s) -
Huang Yi,
Siems Steven T.,
Manton Michael J.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1029/2021jd034832
Subject(s) - ice nucleus , ice crystals , supercooling , drizzle , liquid water content , atmospheric sciences , environmental science , cloud physics , radiative transfer , particle (ecology) , convection , cirrus , climatology , cloud computing , nucleation , meteorology , precipitation , geology , geography , physics , oceanography , thermodynamics , quantum mechanics , computer science , operating system
Abstract In situ observations made over 20 flights during three Austral winters (June to October 2013–2015) were analyzed to characterize the cloud microphysical properties and natural variability of mid‐latitude shallow convective clouds over the Southern Ocean (SO), with a focus on pristine conditions and the mixed‐phase temperature range (MPTR, 0°C to −31°C). Liquid, mixed‐phase, and ice cloud fractions were observed 39%, 44%, and 17% of the time, respectively, under various meteorological settings. Liquid phase clouds were typically characterized by low droplet number concentrations and the common presence of drizzle. Supercooled liquid water was prevalent in the MPTR, while freezing of supercooled raindrops likely formed the primary ice nucleation mechanism in these shallow clouds. Ice particles of various habits were present in the mature/maturing convective cloud cells, suggesting the operation of multiple particle growth regimes. Increased ice particle concentrations (exceeding 100 L −1 ), well in excess of the expected ice nuclei concentrations, were measured at temperature warmer than approximately −12°C, signaling the operation of secondary ice production mechanisms. However, these cloud segments were spatiotemporally inhomogeneous, suggesting the chaotic and turbulent nature of the secondary ice‐forming processes. Accurately representing these processes in global models, while necessary, is likely a challenge. Our analysis also found marked inconsistencies between several satellite‐based cloud phase products that have underpinned recent developments of model parameterization frameworks. Understanding and addressing these inconsistencies are critical toward improving the representation of SO clouds and their radiative properties in climate models.