z-logo
Premium
Graphing the Win Ratio and its components over time
Author(s) -
Finkelstein Dianne M.,
Schoenfeld David A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.7895
Subject(s) - wilcoxon signed rank test , pairwise comparison , generalization , statistics , outcome (game theory) , clinical trial , medicine , computer science , sample size determination , medical physics , mathematics , mann–whitney u test , mathematical analysis , mathematical economics
Clinical trials are often designed to compare treatments on the basis of multiple outcomes. For the analysis of the treatment comparison from such a trial, in 1999, the Finkelstein‐Schoenfeld test was proposed, which was a generalization of the Gehan‐Wilcoxon test based on pairwise comparison of patients on a primary outcome when possible but otherwise on a secondary outcome. In 2012, Pocock and colleagues suggested an estimate based on this concept, the Win Ratio, which summarized the ratio of the number of patients who fared better versus worse on the experimental arm. However, in 2016, Oakes noted that the Win Ratio could be a function of the distribution of follow‐up times of the trial. The aim of this paper is to propose an approach to representing the Win Ratio graphically in such a way that the effect of time on the estimate would be apparent. In addition, the methods are used to display the contribution of each endpoint to the composite. We apply the methods to clinical trials in cancer, cardiology, and neurology. Software is available named winRatioAnalysis in CRAN.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here