Premium
Outcomes and complications of radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion: A comparison between open, semi‐robotic and totally robotic surgery
Author(s) -
Asil Erem,
Canda Abdullah Erdem,
Atmaca Ali Fuat,
Gok Bahri,
Ozcan Muhammet Fuat,
Ardicoglu Arslan,
Balbay Mevlana Derya,
Yıldızhan Mehmet
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the international journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1478-596X
pISSN - 1478-5951
DOI - 10.1002/rcs.2221
Subject(s) - cystectomy , medicine , urinary diversion , blood loss , surgery , extracorporeal , perioperative , blood transfusion , urology , bladder cancer , cancer
Abstract Background It was aimed to compare open versus robotic‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal ileal conduit (ICIC), versus RARC with extracorporeal ileal conduit (ECIC) formation for bladder cancer. Materials and Methods Open, RARC‐ECIC and RARC‐ICIC groups were compared in terms of patient demographics, operative and postoperative parameters, pathological parameters, complications and functional outcomes. Results Mean operative times were lower in the RARC‐ECIC group ( p = 0.004). Mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower ( p < 0.01) in the robotic groups. The blood transfusion was lower in RARC‐ICIC groups ( p < 0.001). Rates of stage pT3–4 disease were the highest in the RARC‐ICIC group ( p = 0.004). LOS was significantly shorter in the RARC‐ICIC group ( p = 0.01). Numbers of Clavien 3–5 complications were lower in the robotic groups ( p = 0.012). Conclusions RARC and ICIC is a complex procedure involving an increased operation time but with the advantages of lower estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, complications and hospital stays compared with open surgery.