Premium
Thermal decomposition of 3,4‐dimethylpentene‐1, 2,3,3‐trimethylpentane, 3,3‐dimethylpentane, and isobutylbenzene in a single pulse shock tube
Author(s) -
Tsang Wing
Publication year - 1969
Publication title -
international journal of chemical kinetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.341
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1097-4601
pISSN - 0538-8066
DOI - 10.1002/kin.550010209
Subject(s) - chemistry , radical , thermal decomposition , decomposition , reaction rate constant , isopropyl , shock tube , pyrolysis , medicinal chemistry , photochemistry , organic chemistry , computational chemistry , thermodynamics , kinetics , shock wave , physics , quantum mechanics
Several hydrocarbons have been pyrolyzed in a single pulse shock tube. Rate parameters for the main bond breaking step have been found to be\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k\left\{{{\rm iC}_3 {\rm H}_7 {-\!-} {\rm CH}\left({{\rm CH}_3} \right){\rm CH} {\raise1pt\hbox{$\Relbar \kern-4pt{\Relbar}$}} {\rm CH}_2 \longrightarrow {\rm iC}_3 {\rm H}_7 \cdot + \cdot {\rm CH}\left({{\rm CH}_3} \right){\rm CH} {\raise1pt\hbox{$\Relbar \kern-4pt{\Relbar}$}} {\rm CH}_2} \right\} = 10^{15.70} \exp \left({{{- 32,500} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{- 32,500} T}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} T}} \right)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document}\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k\left\{{{\rm iC}_3 {\rm H}_7 {-\!-} {\rm C}\left({{\rm CH}_3} \right)_2 {\rm C}_2 {\rm H}_5 \longrightarrow {\rm iC}_3 {\rm H}_7 \cdot + \cdot {\rm C}\left({{\rm CH}_3} \right)_2 {\rm C}_2 {\rm H}_5} \right\} = 10^{16.15} \exp \left({{{- 35,900} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{- 35,900} T}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} T}} \right)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document}\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k\left\{{{\rm C}_2 {\rm H}_5 {-\!-} {\rm C}\left({{\rm CH}_3} \right)_2 {\rm C}_2 {\rm H}_5 \longrightarrow {\rm C}_2 {\rm H}_5 \cdot + \cdot {\rm C}\left({{\rm CH}_3} \right)_2 {\rm C}_2 {\rm H}_5} \right\} = 10^{16.57} \exp \left({{{- 38,800} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{- 38,800} T}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} T}} \right)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document}\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k\left\{{{\rm iC}_3 {\rm H}_7 {-\!-} {\rm CH}_2 {\rm C}_6 {\rm H}_5 \longrightarrow {\rm iC}_3 {\rm H}_7 \cdot + \cdot {\rm CH}_2 {\rm C}_6 {\rm H}_5} \right\} = 10^{15.23} \exp \left({{{- 34,800} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{- 34,800} T}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} T}} \right)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document}In combination with similar studies carried out earlier and through application of the well‐established experimental rule ( k r 2 (AB)/ k r (AA) k r (BB)) 1/2 ∼ 2 where A and B are radicals and the rate constants are for the combination of these radicals, rate parameters for the thermal decomposition of all the hydrocarbons formed from any pair of the following radicals: methyl, ethyl, isopropyl, t ‐butyl, t ‐amyl, allyl, methylallyl, and benzyl have been calculated. The available calculated and experimental values of the decomposition rate constants are in excellent agreement. It appears that, with the possible exception of reactions involving the ejection of methyl radicals, the frequency factors per bond are nearly constant, depending only upon the type of carbon–carbon bond that is being broken. These values are all lower than those expected from the radical recombination rates. Heats of formation of ethyl, t ‐amyl, benzyl, methylallyl, n‐propyl, s ‐butyl, isobutyl, neopentyl, and 3‐pentyl radicals have been derived. Rate parameters for the decomposition of some simple ketones and ethers have also been estimated.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom