Premium
Characterization and Comparison of Different Cathode Materials for SC‐SOFC: LSM, BSCF, SSC, and LSCF
Author(s) -
Rembelski D.,
Viricelle J. P.,
Combemale L.,
Rieu M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
fuel cells
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.485
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1615-6854
pISSN - 1615-6846
DOI - 10.1002/fuce.201100064
Subject(s) - cathode , electrolyte , materials science , anode , solid oxide fuel cell , methane , polarization (electrochemistry) , oxide , conductivity , analytical chemistry (journal) , oxygen , chemical engineering , electrode , chemistry , metallurgy , chromatography , engineering , organic chemistry
Four cathode materials for single chamber solid oxide fuel cell (SC‐SOFC) [La 0.8 Sr 0.2 MnO 3–δ (LSM), Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 Co 0.8 Fe 0.2 O 3–δ (BSCF), Sm 0.5 Sr 0.5 CoO 3–δ (SSC), and La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3–δ (LSCF)] were investigated regarding their chemical stability, electrical conductivity, catalytic activity, and polarization resistance under air and methane/air atmosphere. Electrolyte‐supported fuel cells, with Ce 0.9 Gd 0.1 O 2–δ (CGO) electrolyte and a Ni‐CGO anode, were tested in several methane/air mixtures with each cathode materials between 625 and 725 °C. These single cells were not optimized but only designed to compare the four studied cathodes. The decrease of methane‐to‐oxygen ratio from 2 to 0.67 strongly increased the performance of fuel cells for all cathode materials but the effect of temperature was not always significant. Cells with SSC, BSCF, and LSCF have shown a maximum power density about 20 mW cm –2 while the cell with LSM has given only 5 mW cm –2 .
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom