z-logo
Premium
Characterization and Comparison of Different Cathode Materials for SC‐SOFC: LSM, BSCF, SSC, and LSCF
Author(s) -
Rembelski D.,
Viricelle J. P.,
Combemale L.,
Rieu M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
fuel cells
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.485
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1615-6854
pISSN - 1615-6846
DOI - 10.1002/fuce.201100064
Subject(s) - cathode , electrolyte , materials science , anode , solid oxide fuel cell , methane , polarization (electrochemistry) , oxide , conductivity , analytical chemistry (journal) , oxygen , chemical engineering , electrode , chemistry , metallurgy , chromatography , engineering , organic chemistry
Four cathode materials for single chamber solid oxide fuel cell (SC‐SOFC) [La 0.8 Sr 0.2 MnO 3–δ (LSM), Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 Co 0.8 Fe 0.2 O 3–δ (BSCF), Sm 0.5 Sr 0.5 CoO 3–δ (SSC), and La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3–δ (LSCF)] were investigated regarding their chemical stability, electrical conductivity, catalytic activity, and polarization resistance under air and methane/air atmosphere. Electrolyte‐supported fuel cells, with Ce 0.9 Gd 0.1 O 2–δ (CGO) electrolyte and a Ni‐CGO anode, were tested in several methane/air mixtures with each cathode materials between 625 and 725 °C. These single cells were not optimized but only designed to compare the four studied cathodes. The decrease of methane‐to‐oxygen ratio from 2 to 0.67 strongly increased the performance of fuel cells for all cathode materials but the effect of temperature was not always significant. Cells with SSC, BSCF, and LSCF have shown a maximum power density about 20 mW cm –2 while the cell with LSM has given only 5 mW cm –2 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom