Does Rearranging Multiple‐Choice Item Response Options Affect Item and Test Performance?
Author(s) -
Wang Lin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
ets research report series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.235
H-Index - 5
ISSN - 2330-8516
DOI - 10.1002/ets2.12238
Subject(s) - test (biology) , equating , comparability , affect (linguistics) , statistics , cheating , item response theory , base (topology) , psychology , mathematics , psychometrics , social psychology , paleontology , rasch model , communication , biology , mathematical analysis , combinatorics
Rearranging response options in different versions of a test of multiple‐choice items can be an effective strategy against cheating on the test. This study investigated if rearranging response options would affect item performance and test score comparability. A study test was assembled as the base version from which 3 variant versions were created by rearranging the response options of the items. The 4 versions were administered to randomly equivalent samples of approximately 1,200 test takers in an operational administration. The weighted root mean squared difference and the test characteristic curves were computed from the data to assess the differences between the base and its variant versions. The item‐level and test‐level results show very small differences between the base and the 3 variant versions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom