z-logo
Premium
Effect on bone health of estrogen preparations in premenopausal women with anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and meta‐analyses
Author(s) -
Sim Leslie A.,
McGovern Lauren,
Elamin Mohamed B.,
Swiglo Brian A.,
Erwin Patricia J.,
Montori Victor M.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
international journal of eating disorders
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.785
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1098-108X
pISSN - 0276-3478
DOI - 10.1002/eat.20687
Subject(s) - medicine , anorexia nervosa , meta analysis , bone mineral , femoral neck , bone density , placebo , population , cohort study , confidence interval , randomized controlled trial , prospective cohort study , cohort , osteoporosis , eating disorders , psychiatry , alternative medicine , environmental health , pathology
Objective: Because estrogen therapies are widely prescribed for amenorrhea associated with anorexia nervosa (AN), we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analyses to estimate the influence of estrogen preparations (EP) on bone mineral density in women with AN. Method: Prospective cohort studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of EP use to no treatment or placebo on bone mineral density and bone fractures were included. Independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion and extracted study characteristics, markers of methodologic quality, and outcomes for the intention‐to‐treat population. Results: Using random‐effects meta‐analyses and inconsistency across trials using the I 2 statistic, data were combined across two eligible prospective cohort studies and four RCTs; none reported effects on bone fractures. Compared with placebo or no treatment, low quality evidence found EPs have a moderate effect on bone mineral density in the lumbar spine [ES (effect size) 0.33, 95% CI (confidence interval) 0.09, 0.56; I 2 = 0%)], but no significant effect on the femoral neck (ES 0.13, 95% CI −0.16, 0.43; I 2 = 0%). There were no significant treatment‐subgroup interactions. Discussion: In general, EPs have uncertain benefit and should be avoided by women with AN in whom the success of weight and nutritional rehabilitation is judged by menses resumption. © 2009 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 2010

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom