z-logo
Premium
Hydraulic, mass transfer and heat transfer performance comparison between ordered bed packing and sieve trays
Author(s) -
Spagnolo D. A.,
Chuang K. T.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
the canadian journal of chemical engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1939-019X
pISSN - 0008-4034
DOI - 10.1002/cjce.5450640109
Subject(s) - sieve (category theory) , tray , mass transfer , heat transfer , pressure drop , materials science , chemical engineering , composite material , chemistry , chromatography , mechanics , mechanical engineering , engineering , mathematics , physics , combinatorics
The Girdler–Sulfide (GS) heavy water production process has traditionally used tray columns because of their large size. In recent years, the chemical industry has extended the use of packing to larger columns because of economic and performance advantages. A pilot scale study was thus initiated to compare the hydraulic, mass transfer and heat transfer performance of an ordered bed packing (Mellapak) with sieve trays operating under GS process conditions. Mellapak offered lower pressure drops, higher throughputs and improved heat transfer over sieve trays. However, benefits to deuterium mass transfer were only marginal in large diameter columns.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom