Comparison of intracoronary vs. intravenous administration of abciximab in coronary stenting

There have been animal and human studies looking at intracoronary (IC) use of abciximab with good short‐term clinical outcomes. There exists no data comparing intracoronary with intravenous (IV) administration of abciximab beyond 30 days. We compared the clinical outcomes between the IC (n = 101) and IV (n = 72) group of patients. Patients who had coronary stenting and received abciximab were included in the study. All the patients received the standard systemic bolus dose of abciximab 0.25 mg/kg either via the IC or IV route, followed by a 12‐hr IV infusion at 0.125 μg/kg/min. The 6‐month composite endpoint of death or myocardial infarction was slightly higher in the IV (13.9%) than in the IC group (5.9%; P = 0.04). The frequency of bleeding complications was similar in both groups. The IC bolus route of abciximab may be superior to the intravenous route. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to validate these findings. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:31–34. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.