z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Family physicians' involvement in palliative cancer care
Author(s) -
Moon Christine C.,
Mah Kenneth,
Pope Ashley,
Swami Nadia,
Han Breffni,
Lau Jenny,
Mak Ernie,
alAwamer Ahmed,
Banerjee Subrata,
Dawson Laura A.,
Husain Amna,
Rodin Gary,
Le Lisa W.,
Zimmermann Camilla
Publication year - 2023
Publication title -
cancer medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 53
ISSN - 2045-7634
DOI - 10.1002/cam4.5371
Subject(s) - medicine , palliative care , logistic regression , odds ratio , confidence interval , cancer , family medicine , nursing
Abstract Background Family physicians' (FPs) long‐term relationships with their oncology patients position them ideally to provide primary palliative care, yet their involvement is variable. We examined perceptions of FP involvement among outpatients receiving palliative care at a cancer center and identified factors associated with this involvement. Methods Patients with advanced cancer attending an oncology palliative care clinic (OPCC) completed a 25‐item survey. Eligible patients had seen an FP within 5 years. Binary multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with (1) having seen an FP for palliative care within 6 months, and (2) having a scheduled/planned FP appointment. Results Of 258 patients, 35.2% (89/253) had seen an FP for palliative care within the preceding 6 months, and 51.2% (130/254) had a scheduled/planned FP appointment. Shorter travel time to FP (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48–0.93, p  = 0.02), the FP having a 24‐h support service (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.02–3.76, p  = 0.04), and a positive perception of FP's care (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01–1.09, p  = 0.01) were associated with having seen the FP for palliative care. English as a first language (OR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.04–8.11, p  = 0.04) and greater ease contacting FP after hours (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.08–1.64, p  = 0.008) were positively associated, and female sex of patient (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.30–0.87, p  = 0.01) and travel time to FP (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47–0.93, p  = 0.02) negatively associated with having a scheduled/planned FP appointment. Number of OPCC visits was not associated with either outcome. Conclusion Most patients had not seen an FP for palliative care. Accessibility, availability, and equity are important factors to consider when planning interventions to encourage and facilitate access to FPs for palliative care.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here