Premium
Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects and patent foramen ovale under intracardiac echocardiographic guidance: Feasibility and comparison with transesophageal echocardiography
Author(s) -
Hijazi Ziyad M.,
Wang Zhong,
Cao QiLing,
Koenig Peter,
Waight David,
Lang Roberto
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/1522-726x(200102)52:2<194::aid-ccd1046>3.0.co;2-4
Subject(s) - medicine , patent foramen ovale , septum secundum , foramen secundum , intracardiac injection , cardiology , esophagus , cardiac catheterization , heart septal defect , balloon , percutaneous
Abstract Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been employed successfully for guiding transcatheter device closure of secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO). However, the use of TEE for device closure requires general anesthesia. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) can provide similar anatomical views that might replace the use of TEE for device closure. Eleven patients (eight female/three male) with secundum ASD and PFO associated with strokes underwent attempts at transcatheter closure of their defects under sequential TEE and ICE guidance (six patients) and under ICE alone (five patients). The ages of the patients ranged from 6.6 to 74.7 yr, and their weights ranged from 23 to 124.5 kg. The sizes of the defects, as measured by TEE (six patients), ranged from 3 to 27 mm and, as measured by ICE (11 patients), from 3 to 27 mm. The balloon‐stretched diameter of the ASD, as measured by TEE (six patients), ranged from 16 to 38 mm and, as measured by ICE (11 patients), from 16 to 35 mm. Both techniques correlated well for the measured two‐dimensional diameter and for the balloon‐stretched diameter ( r = 0.97 and 0.98, respectively). Both TEE and ICE provided similar views of the defects and the various stages of device deployment. Owing to the proximity of the left atrium to the esophagus, however, the images obtained by ICE were more helpful and informative than those obtained by TEE. All patients experienced successful device placement (six patients under both TEE and ICE; five patients under ICE guidance alone); complete closure of the defects was effected in nine patients, whereas two patients had small residual shunts. There were no complications. We conclude that ICE provides unique images of the atrial communications and measurements similar to those obtained by TEE. ICE potentially could replace TEE as a guiding imaging tool for ASD and PFO device closure, thus eliminating the need for general anesthesia. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:194–199. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.