Premium
Diet and cancer any progress in the interim?
Author(s) -
Byers Tim
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/1097-0142(19881015)62:1+<1713::aid-cncr2820621309>3.0.co;2-w
Subject(s) - interim , medicine , cancer , breast cancer , colorectal cancer , diet and cancer , epidemiology , environmental health , gerontology , archaeology , history
Abstract It has been 5 years since the National Research Council (NRC) Committee on Diet, Nutrition and Cancer published “Interim Dietary Guidelines” for the nutritional prevention of cancer. The term “interim” implies that these recommendations should be regarded as temporary, pending more definitive findings from additional scientific research. This article reviews findings relevant to the connections between diet and cancer that have emerged from nutritional epidemiology subsequent to the 1982 the NRC report. Some recent research has supported the earlier work which served as a basis for the interim recommendations, some has not, and additional hypotheses have emerged. There continues to be evidence, although it is inconsistent, that dietary fat may be an important factor in colon cancer, and that something related to fruits and vegetables, perhaps carotene, may lower the risk of lung cancer. However, the hypothesized relationships between dietary fat and breast cancer and between dietary fiber and colon cancer have been less consistently supported by new findings. Meanwhile, a new hypothesis has emerged relating alcohol intake to breast cancer risk, although many important questions remain regarding the age at which alcohol use may affect risk, and the dose above which risk is increased. The last 5 years seem to have been characterized by only slow progress in our understanding of the relationship between diet and cancer. It is clear that in 1988 we are still very much in the interim. Critical methodologic assessments of the reasons for the discrepancies in findings among the various studies, and meta analytic approaches may be helpful in increasing our understanding of the set of epidemiologic research conducted to date. More important, however, are the many types of studies now underway, including more rigorously designed observational studies and chemo‐preventive and dietary‐preventive trials. These studies will likely provide more definitive future answers to the questions we still face in the interim.