Premium
Determining a ‘safe’ high‐mass limit in matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionisation time‐of‐flight mass spectra of coal derived materials with reference to instrument noise †
Author(s) -
Lazaro M. J.,
Herod A. A.,
Domin M.,
Zhuo Y.,
Islas C. A.,
Kandiyoti R.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0231(19990730)13:14<1401::aid-rcm656>3.0.co;2-e
Subject(s) - chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , mass spectrum , spectral line , mass spectrometry , detection limit , standard deviation , computational physics , statistics , chromatography , mathematics , physics , astronomy
Abstract Three methods for determining a ‘safe’ estimate for high‐mass limits of MALDI spectra of coal derived liquids were explored, using a sample of coal‐tar pitch and its pyridine‐insoluble fraction. Co‐addition of increasing numbers of single‐shot spectra (10, 30, 50 and 100 pulses) showed visually observable reductions in noise levels, consistent with robust and statistically meaningful signals. Three separate types of post‐acquisition calculation were used to identify high‐mass limits of the spectra. (i) A literature method indicated high‐mass limits similar to those observed visually—as a shift from baseline at the highest masses, nearly 350 000 u for the coal tar pitch and about 390 000 u for its pyridine insoluble fraction. (ii) Comparing instrument signal with pre‐selected multiples of the standard deviation, upper mass estimates of between 40–60 000 u for the coal‐tar pitch and about 95 000 u for its pyridine‐insoluble fraction were found. (iii) Calculation of the slope was used to identify ‘lift‐off’ of the spectrum from baseline. The angle between the smoothed spectrum and the baseline was matched to a pre‐selected value (e.g. 0.5 ° and 1 °). However, the arbitrary specification of the key parameter did not establish this last method on a firm basis. The choice of a criterion for estimating high‐mass limits of MALDI spectra remains a semi‐quantitative procedure; a reasonably conservative high‐mass limit may be estimated by comparison of signal with five times the standard deviation. However, evaluation of size exclusion chromatograms of the present samples using polystyrene standards suggests that molecular mass distributions of pitch samples arrived at by MALDI mass spectrometry are, at least partly, determined by the limitations of available instruments. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.