English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this review article, I will first broadly outline the proposals made in Levinson (2000), then criticize his central ideas in discussing problems raised in recent papers by Wilson (2002a, 2002b, 2002c), Carston (1995, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2001), Matsui (2002) and others, and finally extend the discussion to suggest how one might account for Levinson's observations in Relevance Theory (henceforth RT). Towards the end, I will offer an overall evaluation of the place of Levinson's theory of generalized conversational implicature (GCI) and Sperber and Wilson's RT in the recent literature on cognition and communication. The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, I will summarize the basic assumptions on which neo-Gricean pragmatics is based, and

Relevance-Theoretic Objections to Levinson's GCI Theory (S. C. Levinson, Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature)