English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper is a comparative study of the healthcare sector in Haiti and China. The primary objective was to find a systematic approach aimed at ensuring equitable distribution of healthcare services in third world countries, particularly in least developed countries using Haiti an economically impoverished country in the Western Hemisphere as the litmus test. To establish the proposed hypothesis, the study relied on existing research through an extensive literature review that focused on a comparative analysis of an almost non-existing healthcare system in Haiti to that of China’s improved and evolving healthcare system. Whilst China is regarded internationally as a developing country despite its remarkable economic achievements within the past three to four decades, Haiti also a developing country could be regarded as under-developed compared to China. By conducting an investigation into selected areas within the health sectors in both countries, this paper hypothesized that China’s success and feasible improvement within the health sector could be used as template for improvement in the healthcare sector in Haiti and as lessons for other third world countries to emulate. This explanatory study relied on data from organizations including the Global Health Data Exchange, the Institute for Health Metrics Evaluation, the Demographic and Health Survey Program to make quantitative analysis using analytical tools including the Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) from the World Health Organization and the Health Equity Monitor (HEM) with data from the Global Health Observatory. The combination of these tools enabled the study to make proper assessment, analyze data, and tackle the research problem, questions and interpretation of reviewed literature. The results from the comparisons made revealed that strict adherence and continuous improvement of policies in under-developed countries despite financial restraints has high probable impacts other than non-adherence.

A systematic approach to improve health equity within 3rd world communities -evidence from the comparison of Haiti and China