English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

cArlos g. sAntos-gAllego, JUAn J. BADimOn Correct stratification of cardiovascular risk (CVR) is complex. In primary prevention [defined as the preventive activity performed in people without atherosclerotic evidence (most of the population > 35 years)] this is conceived as a population strategy, consisting in identifying high risk subjects to decrease levels of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) by means of lifestyle or medication changes, as this is a much more efficient approach than focusing on the low risk population. The best tool to establish priorities in primary prevention is the accurate individual CVR estimation using CVR scores or functions. Cardiovascular risk scores are mathematical models based on cohort prospective studies modeling CVR as a function of different nonmodifiable (as age and sex) and modifiable (smoking, hypertension, cholesterol or its fractions and diabetes

¿Podemos estratificar el riesgo cardiovascular en la población argentina?