English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) can provide a way for HIV-serodiscordant couples to safely fall pregnant. However, their high cost raises concerns about distributive justice, especially now as we are laying the foundation for a national health insurance. Considering that the right to access reproductive healthcare services is specifically mentioned in the South African Constitution, a discussion surrounding ARTs and their funding is warranted. This article argues that the state does not have a moral duty to provide ARTs for serodiscordant couples in the current socioeconomic environment that SA finds itself.

Should the state fund assisted reproductive technologies for HIV-discordant couples in South Africa who want to have children?