English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In Serbia it is prescribed that foreign legal or natural persons could not become owners of agricultural land, while in Montenegro, Croatia and The Federation of Bosnia and Hercegovina there is the ban for both agricultural and forest land. The aim of this paper is to show that such a ban creates an economic environment where an optimal allocation of agricultural and forest land as a production factor could not be achieved. The cost - benefit analysis shows that main gainers are domestic producers and buyers of land who are able to realize a monopoly profit, whereas sellers of land are at loss, getting a lower economic rent, as well as foreign buyers. A total loss of domestic sellers only is bigger than a total profit of buyers. In the end, it is being pointed to a relativity of the ban, in the sense of a possibility to easily get past the ban through provisions of the other norms. The conclusion points out that an eventual suspension of the ban would stimulate efficiency of domestic economies and an increase in the neto welfare

The ban on foreigners acquiring property rights on agricultural and forest land in Serbia and other region countries