English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Results of opinion polls are used frequently in the press and media users rely on them in order to form an opinion or to make a decision. Sometimes, the reliability of polls can be questioned. This study examines the relative impact of source and type of medium on the credibility of published public opinion poll results. We conducted a two-factorial experimental online survey study (N = 150 German internet users). Manipulated factors were source (well-known vs. unknown polling institute) and type of medium (quality press vs. tabloid press). While we find significant effects for type of medium, effects for source cannot be confirmed. Independent from the source of the result, the same result being published by quality press is considered more credible than when published by tabloid press.

studies in communication, media

Same result, different effect The credibility attribution to public opinion research results Gleiches Ergebnis, andere Wirkung Die Glaubwürdigkeit von Ergebnissen der Markt- und Meinungsforschung