English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article discusses the much awaited ICJ judgment of February 2007 in the Bosnian Genocide case. It assesses whether the respondent (Serbia) had access to Court and subsequently focuses on the substantive issues raised by Bosnia's claim of genocide. These include the Court's treatment of (i) the prohibition on genocide, especially as compared to the jurisprudence of the ICTY; (ii) issues of attribution of acts of Bosnian Serbs to the state of Serbia; (iii) questions of responsibility for failure to prevent and punish genocide, as well as issues of reparation. It concludes that while the Court rendered a balanced judgment, the proceedings as a whole, spanning 14 years, underline the Court's limited role in the settlement of politically sensitive cases arising out of major political crises.

The Genocide Case Before the International Court of Justice