English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Judging from the state of affairs, calls for sustainable development over the last decades have largely fallen on deaf ears. Today, dire scientific warnings about the direction of the planet are more commonplace. Two recent examples have been warnings about “hothouse earth” (Steffen et al. 2018) and cautions about the sixth mass extinction (Ceballos et al. 2017). One factor contributing to this failure is the creation of more robust scientific knowledge on sustainability that can be used to understand societal processes and to coalesce society into action to address these pressing challenges. The task not only includes fostering more constructive dialogues between scientific community and society; it also comprises the production and exchange of knowledge that crosses the natural and the social sciences, especially including research that spans a more diverse range of social science perspectives. However, establishing these dialogues and research foci has proven to be a tall order given the increasing specialization of the academy, further solidified by entrenched positions in faculties and in individual disciplines.

Better balancing the social and natural dimensions in sustainability research