English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The study by Nocera et al. (2007) is an interesting exercise in the commonality and thus transferability of species–habitat relations at different locations. Nocera et al. (2007:Table 4) found that Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) occupancy and abundance were consistently associated with the height-density of May vegetation at three widely separated locations. Conversely, the occupancy and abundance of Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis) differed substantially between these disparate locations and was negatively associated with vegetation in some locations and positively in others. Nocera et al. (2007:Discussion) explained this apparent contradiction in habitat relations to site-level factors that they did not study; for instance, they note (my emphasis):

Effects at the Landscape Scale May Constrain Habitat Relations at Finer Scales