English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In early war crimes trials such as in Nuremburg, documentary evidence was decisive in convicting the defendants. Witness evidence was of lesser importance.1 By contrast, in Bosnian war crimes trials the testimony of witnesses is essential, forming much of the evidential weight upon which the courts decisions are based.  If witnesses are not found or if they are unwilling or unable to give evidence in court, trials are unlikely to proceed.

THE PROTECTION OF WITNESSES IN BOSNIAN WAR CRIMES TRIALS: A FAIR BALANCE BETWEEN THE INTERESTS OF VICTIMS AND THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED?