English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

States seek to protect their interests and territories in the international system. To achieve their goals, countries engage in what international relations theorists call deterrence: “the act of dissuading a targeted state from taking certain actions.” But states must decide what type of deterrence strategy to use in order to get what they want—either low-grade verbal or physical threats, or high-grade use of force. Using force sends a strong message to another state, but this action could lead to a costly war. In this project I considered deterrence that leads to stalemate to be a successful outcome, because neither country in confl ict has lost face but both countries have avoided war.

Stalemate as Success: The Importance of Low-Grade Deterrence in Post–World War II Asian International Relations