English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Most large research libraries maintain storage facilities containing low-use material. Many of these facilities are filling rapidly as libraries repurpose space on central campuses and rely more heavily on digital collections. Many of the same low-use titles are being stored in multiple storage facilities, but in the current environment of rapid delivery via resource sharing networks, it may no longer be as necessary to maintain all low-use print material locally since libraries can rely on partners to supply occasionally-needed material if it is not already available digitally. The paper summarizes successful projects at the Purdue University Libraries that withdrew low-use serial titles from a storage facility, and covers a current project that identifies monographs as candidates for de-selection. Using the WorldCat Collection Analysis, circulation statistics, and selector input, these projects sought to reduce the amount of material in storage. Building library collections to meet user needs has long been a cornerstone of effective library service; learning what to discard from physical collections may soon be equally important.

The Other Side of the Coin: De-Selecting Material from a Research Library's Storage Facility