English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Purpose: The aim of the article is to identify the reporting effects of the choice of method for the depreciation of fixed assets, defined in the accounting policy of a public university. Methodology: Empirical (qualitative) research was conducted in a deliberately selected group of public classical universities operating in Poland. The empirical material was collected by analyzing documents and from partially structured interviews conducted with the bursars (or their deputies) of these universities, who are considered to have the broadest knowledge about phenomena directly related to the surveyed entities’ finance and accounting policies. Findings: Based on the results of the research, the depreciation approaches applied in public universities in Poland have been identified. Legal regulations relating to the management of these fixed assets, which are important for implementing university tasks (i.e., necessary for research and education at the highest possible level), have also been established. The heterogeneity of the approaches leads to the lack of comparability of financial statements in this uniform group of public universities. Consequently, the identified nonuniform solutions affect the level of costs determined by universities while implementing tasks. Practical implications: The findings are important for university accountants (bursars) since they present them with solutions that can be applied in practice while pointing to the consequences of these different approaches. Originality/value: The principal cognitive value of the findings is the provision of empirical arguments revealing the diversity of depreciation methods among units from the same sector of the economy – classical universities in Poland. At the same time, one of the sources of the problem of limited comparability of their financial results was indicated.

The reporting effects of different approaches to the depreciation of fixed assets in the accounting policies of public universities in Poland