English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The elaboration of environmental quality standards, whether primary or secondary (in the case of Chilean legislation), is done through an administrative procedure that includes a technical and economic analysis. In this context, the General Analysis on Economic and Social Impact (AGIES for its acronym in Spanish) are developed. The methodology for the generation of AGIES varies according to the type of regulation. However, the new jurisprudential tendency restrains and forces the administration to use an economic analysis based on cost-benefit criteria, which ends up being incompatible with the specific circumstances and protection objectives of these regulations. This paper studies the role of the AGIES in the process of generating environmental quality standards and the relevance of the jurisprudential tendency in this regard. Particularly, this paper analyzes the interpretative conflicts that arise from these new rulings and their consequences for environmental justice. Finally, this paper considers the impact of the restrictions imposed to the administration, and suggests some alternatives to the cost-benefit framework that better adapts to the nature and objectives of the instruments to regulate environmental standards.

La desnaturalización del rol del Análisis General del Impacto Económico y Social en la generación de Normas de Calidad Ambiental