English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A comparative analysis of porosity values computed from sonic and neutron-density logs obtained from the same well is here presented. The aim is to identify the more reliable logging tool between sonic and neutron-density in the estimation of porosity values in a formation. Two wells from different parts of Niger Delta were logged for Transit times, bulk density and hydrogen index of the formation as a function of depth. The analysis of sonic, density and neutron porosity values shows a conventional trend of decrease in porosity with depth. Sonic porosity values of well A, and well B varies from 1 to 17%, and 27 to 60% respectively while Neutron-Density Porosity values of well A, and well B varies from 24 to 45%, and 21 to 37% respectively. The Coefficient of Variation for sonic porosity data are 56%, and 23%of well A, and well B respectively , similarly the Coefficient of Variation for Neutron-Density porosity data are 15%, and 14% of well A, and well B respectively. Coefficient of variation of Neutron-density log derived porosities is less than sonic log derived porosities; therefore Neutron-density log derived porosity is more reliable tool for porosity data estimation than sonic log derived porosity. Neutron and density logging tool is here recommended for determination of a reliable porosity value of a formation.

Comparative analysis of sonic and neutron-density logs for porosity determination in the South-eastern Niger Delta Basin, Nigeria