English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article will study how the social debate 2.0, that is to say, one that occurs in social media, specifically Twitter, is polarized on having treated topics of political, social or ideological nature. For this, an interesting field of study they are the interviews realized to Jose Maria Aznar in Antenna 3 and to Luis de Guindos in the Sixth, since due to the public relevancy of both prominent figures, there were propitiated a number of variables to analyzethe polarization of social red Twitter in addition to the participation of all the social actors.Este artículo estudiará cómo el debate social 2.0, es decir, aquel que se da en las redes sociales, más concretamente en Twitter, se polariza al tratar temas de índole política, social o ideológica. Por esto, un campo interesante de estudio son las entrevistas realizadas a José María Aznar en Antena 3 y a Luis de Guindos en la Sexta, ya que debido a la relevancia pública de ambos personajes, se propiciaron una serie de variables que permite analizar la polarización de las red social Twitter además la participación de todos los actores sociales

Twitter y la polarización del debate político:análisis del caso #objetivodeguindos y #aznara3.