English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Developing an identity as a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) researcher is associated with tensions of expanding on one’s disciplinary identity and often traversing the liminal space between disciplines that result in a newfound perception of professional self. This study explores the differences that emerged in SoTL identity formation among three different groups of researchers. Focus groups of faculty, graduate students, and professional staff who identified as SoTL researchers were conducted at one comprehensive research institution. Using thematic analysis, the differences and similarities for each of these groups in terms of barriers to SoTL identity formation and motivations for developing a SoTL identity are shared. Reflecting on these barriers and opportunities, a variety of implications for practice for Educational Developers are suggested as they look to support the SoTL identity development of researchers at their institutions.Le developpement d’une identite en tant que chercheur en avancement des connaissances en enseignement et en apprentissage (ACEA) est associe a des tensions d’expansion de l’identite disciplinaire et consiste souvent a traverser l’espace liminal entre les disciplines qui aboutit a une perception nouvelle de son soi professionnel. Cette etude explore les differences qui emergent lors de la formation de l’identite en ACEA parmi trois groupes differents de chercheurs. Des groupes de discussion de professeurs, d’etudiants de cycle superieur et de personnel professionnel qui s’identifient comme chercheurs en ACEA ont ete organises dans un etablissement de recherche complete. L’analyse thematique a permis de mettre a jour les differences et les similarites parmi chacun de ces groupes en termes d’entraves a la formation d’une identite en ACEA, ainsi que les motivations necessaires au developpement d’une identite en ACEA. La reflexion sur ces entraves et sur les opportunites permet de suggerer une variete d’implications pour la pratique des conseillers pedagogiques quand ceux-ci sont a la recherche de soutien pour le developpement de l’identite en ACEA des chercheurs dans leurs etablissements respectifs.

the  canadian journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning

Exploring the Role of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the Context of the Professional Identities of Faculty, Graduate Students, and Staff in Higher Education