English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Herein I respond to the criticism and to the complains by Benestad (PatternRecogn. Phys. 1, 91-92, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/prp-1-91-2013) ofScafetta (Pattern Recogn. Phys. 1, 37-57, 2013,http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/prp-1-37-2013) that I found misleading and nottenable. More significantly, Benestad did not find any physical normathematical error in Scafetta's work. Thus, Scafetta scientific results remainfully confirmed.

pattern recognition in physics

Reply to Benestad's comment on "Discussions on common errors in  analyzing sea level accelerations, solar trends and global warming" by  Scafetta (2013), arXiv:1306.2011