English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Variabilities and changes due to natural and anthropogenic causes in the\udwater cycle always presented a challenge for water management planning.\udPractitioners traditionally coped with variabilities in the hydrological\udprocesses by assuming stationarity in the probability distributions and\udattempted to address non-stationarity by revising this probabilistic\udproperties via continued hydro-climatological observations. Recently, this\udpractice was questioned and more reliance on Global Circulation Models was\udput forward as an alternative for water management plannig.  \udThis paper takes a brief assessment of the state of Global Circulation Models\ud(GCM) and their applications by presenting case studies over Global, European\udand African domains accompanied by literature examples. Our paper\uddemonstrates core deficiencies in GCM based water resources assessments and\udarticulates the need for improved Earth system monitoring that is essential\udnot only for water managers, but to aid the improvements of GCMs in the\udfuture

Crystal balls into the future: are global circulation and water balance models ready?