English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

. Bottom pressure estimates from three different Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE)series (an experimental Center for Space Research (CSR) swath series, ITSG2016, and ITSG2018)and two global ocean models (OMCT and MPIOM) are compared to Jason altimetrysea level anomaly estimates in order to determine the accuracy of the GRACEand model data at sub-monthly timescales. We find that the GRACE series arecapable of explaining 25 %–75 % of the sub-monthly altimetric variabilityover most of those ocean regions that have high signal strength. All threeGRACE series explain more of the sub-monthly variability than thede-aliasing products they were created with. Upon examination over finerfrequency bands, the GRACE series prove superior at explaining thealtimetric signal for signals with periods as short as 10 d.

Evaluation of sub-monthly oceanographic signal in GRACE “daily” swath series using altimetry