English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

. The quantitative revolution in the field of geography is commonly recalled asa story of scientific success, overcoming parochial, regionalist andideographic modes of geography. This paper, however, suggests a different,yet parallel narrative. It reveals that the methodological reorientationtowards statistical geography was a coping strategy, adopted by researchersfrom within and outside the discipline of geography in order to defend theanalysis of ecological (i. e., spatially aggregated) data against thepowerful critique of producing “ecological fallacies”. Through emphasizinghow the quantitative revolution was an expression of both modernizing andprotective tendencies within the field of geography, the paper contributes toa more concrete understanding of what motivates methodological change ingeography.

Fortschritt und Verdrängung – Ökologischer Fehlschluss und quantitative Revolution in der Geographie