English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

. The paper outlines an approach to right wing populism in recent years notonly in critizing the use of so called alternative facts but using theconcept of a regressive modernisation as a debate which includes populistmovements into a broader social theory and diagnosis of western societies.The evolution of regressive modernisation reveals both, the success of aneoliberal globalization and a rise of marginality and perceived dangers of adownward mobility. These findings are used in order to explain certaintransformations of academic fields in general and social geography inparticular. It is argued that the success of postmodern geographies may beseen as an overcoming of hegemonic discourses of positivism as well as ofmarxism, but was and is unable to counteract geographies of recent right wingpopulism. Even the positions of the „march for science“ which hasbeen a major initiative to fight for academic integrity are seen as not beingsufficient to rebuilt an „antipopulist“ social geography. Thissituation leads to some suggestions and recommendation for further work inthis field.

„March for Sozialgeographie“? Rechtspopulismus als Zumutung und die regressive Moderne als Herausforderung der Humangeographie