English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

. This article explores the interplay of inequality, spaceand age(ing) from an intersectional perspective. It argues, that a spatialresearch methodology is most fruitful in order to include age(ing) indebates on intersectionality and inequality. Drawing on geographicalgerontology and inequality research, we scrutinize the research gap at theintersection of these fields: While age is a neglected factor inintersectional debates on inequality, questions of power are hardlyaddressed by geographical gerontology. To bridge this research gap, wepropose space as methodological perspective. By showing how the negotiationof age(ing) varies in different spatial settings, the article emphasises thevalue of spatial approaches to analyse the two faces of age(ing) – age as amarker of difference and ageing as a process. On a larger scale, the articlepoints to the potential of a spatial methodology to approach the complexityof intersectionality.

Ungleichheit, Intersektionalität und Alter(n) – für eine räumliche Methodologie in der Ungleichheitsforschung