English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The high resolution non-hydrostatic Harmonie  model (Seity et al., 2012) seems capable of delivering high quality  precipitation forecasts. The quality with respect to the European  radar composite is assessed using the Model Evaluation Tool, as  distributed by the NCAR DTC (Developmental Testbed Center, 2012), and compared to that of  the reference run of Hirlam (Unden et al., 2002), the current operational  NWP model at KNMI. Both neighbourhood and object-based verification  methods are compared for a week with several high intensity  precipitation events in July 2010. It is found that Hirlam scores  very well in most metrics, and that in spite of the higher  resolution the added value of the Harmonie model is sometimes hard  to quantify. However, higher precipitation intensities are better  represented in the Harmonie model with its higher  resolution. Object-based methods do not yet yield a sharp  distinction between the different models, as it proves difficult to  construct a meaningful and distinguishing metric with a solid  physical basis for the many settings that can be varied

A quantitative evaluation of the high resolution HARMONIE model for critical weather phenomena