English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the last years, a great deal of research has demonstrated that driving simulator studies can be a suitable alternative to field studies. However, a driving simulator must be correctly validated for each specific aspect of driver behavior such as speeds, steering control, driver response, etc. This paper aims to investigate a behavioral validation of the interactive fixed-base driving simulator in order to verify the DGSIT driving simulator's usefulness as a tool for distraction research on a two-lane highway. Fifteen drivers were asked to complete three levels of a cognitive distraction task (n-back task) concurrently while driving either an instrumented vehicle or the simulator. The three pairs of distacted driving behaviors were analyzed in terms of absolute validity and relative validity. Results suggested that the participants’ simulated driving behavior were not significantly different from the on-road driving behavior, establishing the relative validities. Especially, heart rate established absolute validity as well.

2C4-2 Validation of a driving simulator for driver distraction research on a two-lane highway