English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Roentgenograms of 17 healthy adults' feet were taken in using Cobey's poterior view in a standing position. Medial and lateral wedge arch support were used. The medial side's degrees were 5, 10, 15, 20, and lateral side's degrees were 5, 10. In all roentgenograms we measured Ankle mortise-heel contact angle (A-H angle) and Tibiocalcaneal angle (TB-C angle). On the inversion side the mean A-H angle was 9.3, 7.7, 6.3, 5.6, 4.0 in 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, respechvely and mean TB-C angle was 1.7, 3.6, 6.4, 9.2, 11.5 in 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 respechvely. There was a significant relationship between degree of arch support and A-H angle or TB-C angle. On the eversion side, the mean A-H angle was 9.3, 8.6, 9.0 in 0, 5, 10, respechvely and that of TB-C angle was 1.7, 1.0, 1.2 in 0, 5, 10 respectively. There was no significant relationship between degree of arch support and A-H angle or TB-C angle. However the TB-C angle can distinguish the eversion side from that of the control or inversion side.

Usefulness of Cobey's Posterior View in Assessment of Inversion and Eversion of Hindfoot.