English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Sexism has typically been described as unitary hostility toward women. However Glick & Fiske (1996, 2001) proposed a more subtle way of sexual discrimination toward women, namely ambivalent sexism and developed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory(ASI). According to Glick and Fiske, there are two complementary forms of sexist attitudes: hostile sexism and benevolent sexism. Hostile Sexism(HS) can be described as the typical antipathy that is commonly assumed as sexist prejudices. In contrast, Benevolent Sexism(BS) is defined “as a set of interrrelated attitudes toward women that are sexist in terms of viewing women stereotypically and in restrictes roles, but that are subjectively positive in feeling tone and also tend to elicit behaviors typically categorized as prosocial or intimacy seeking”(Glick & Fiske, 1996). Ahn, Kim, & Ahn(2005) developed a Korean version of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (K-ASI) and tested and confirmed the validity of K-ASI. In 2007, K-ASI was revised to extend the range of application for not only adults but also juveniles(Ahn, Paik, Kim, Kim, & Kim, 2007). The present study invesgated how hostile and benevolent sexism predicted the acceptance of rape myth, using the revised K-ASI, and thereby examined the construct validity of the revised K-ASI at the same time.

Prediction of Rape Myth Acceptance by the Ambivalent Sexism