English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Crucial issues in the Omnibus Bill on Job Creation are the actual discussion today. In particular, the potential for executive heavy in Article 170 paragraph (1) of Omnibus Bill on Job Creation is because  the Law could be amended by a Government Regulation. This paper trues to analyze the problems of conception in the Omnibus Bill on Job Creation and also the problems in the perspective of statutory theory. The research method used is normative juridical legal research. The results show that Article 170 paragraph (1) of Omnibus Bill on Job Creation contradicts Article 7 of Law no. 12 of 2011 and the theory of legislation put forward by Adolf Merkl and Hans Kelsen's theory of norms level.

randwick international of social science  journal/randwick international of social science journal

The Problems of Conception of Law Amendment with Government Regulations of Omnibus Bill on Job Creation Studied from the Theory of Legislation Perspective